(California Court of Appeal) – Held that an interspousal transaction was not a transmutation of the husband’s community interest in certain real property. The document he signed left ambiguous what his intent was. Reversed.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/717d0/717d015cae9b67afac60202c5643b2b0ffe997ac" alt=""
Go to Source
Author:
Tulsa Family Lawyer and Mediator
Go to Source
Author: